Models of shared leadership compared

Guide · Models

In briefShared leadership has several models: the dual leadership (two full roles at the top), the leadership tandem (two people in one role), top-sharing (leadership in part-time), rotating leadership in a team, and hybrid forms. Which fits depends on task, level and goals.

The five common models

Shared leadership is not a single model but a spectrum. Five forms appear most often in practice:

Comparison at a glance

ModelWhoTypical levelFits when …
Dual leadership2 people, 2 full rolesmanagement, boardthe task is too big for one person
Leadership tandem2 people, 1 rolemiddle managementa position is to be shared
Top-sharing2 people part-timeall levelsleadership in part-time is wanted
Rotating leadershipteam, changingagile teamsleadership is distributed situationally
Hybridmixed formproject-dependentstandard models don’t fit
Five models of shared leadership compared

Which model fits?

The choice hinges on three questions: how divisible is the task? What level are you at? And how much responsibility is really to be shared? A dual leadership at board level places different demands than top-sharing at team-lead level.

Aus meiner Praxis

A common mistake is choosing the model by the people’s wishes rather than the task. The task decides whether responsibility can be sensibly shared – not the calendar.

For the very top, the deeper look at dual leadership is worthwhile; for operational duo practice, the article on the leadership tandem.

Frequently asked questions

What’s the difference between dual leadership and a tandem?

In a dual leadership each has a full role; in a tandem two people share one role.

Can you combine models?

Yes, hybrid forms are common – e.g. a tandem with rotating additional responsibilities.

Sources & further reading

  • Pearce, C. L. & Conger, J. A. (2003): Shared Leadership. Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Sage.
  • Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E. & Marrone, J. A. (2007): Shared Leadership in Teams. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217–1234.
  • Wang, D., Waldman, D. A. & Zhang, Z. (2014): A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), 181–198.

How this article was written

This article is based on my own experience as a leader in a job-sharing model and 15 years of leading in banking, as well as the established research on shared leadership (see sources). Where I speak from practice, it is marked as such.

Amrit Rescheneder

About the author

Amrit Rescheneder

Expert in co-leadership

Amrit Rescheneder helps organisations and leadership tandems build shared leadership that works. She led in a job-sharing model herself for years – after 15 years of leadership responsibility in banking. She knows shared leadership from practice, not from textbooks.

  • 15 years of leadership responsibility in banking
  • Led in a leadership tandem herself for years
  • Guides organisations & leadership duos

More about me →

Updated: 25 July 2026

Scroll to Top